Okay, so I’ve been diving deep into tennis stats lately, trying to get a better handle on predicting match outcomes. Today, I decided to tackle the Auger Aliassime vs. Hanfmann match.

First, I pulled up both players’ recent match histories. You know, just to get a feel for their current form. I looked at things like win/loss ratios, who they played against, and the scores. Basic stuff, really.
Then I started digging into head-to-head records. Like, have these two played each other before? If so, who won, and what were the scores? This can sometimes give you a clue, you know, if there’s a clear pattern.
- Auger Aliassime’s recent performance – wins, losses, opponents.
- Hanfmann’s recent performance – same deal.
- Their head-to-head record, if any.
After that, I checked out some surface stats. Like, does one player do way better on clay compared to hard courts? This match is on clay, so that’s super important. It can really make a difference, trust me.
My Process
I spent a good chunk of time just comparing their stats side-by-side. It’s kinda like detective work, trying to piece together the clues. I’m not gonna lie, it can be a bit tedious, but it’s kinda fun too, in a nerdy way.
Finally, I formed my prediction. It wasn’t just a gut feeling, though. I really tried to base it on the data I collected. It’s not a sure thing, of course, but I felt like I had a pretty good reasoning behind my pick.

So, yeah, that’s basically how I went about predicting this match. It’s all about gathering the info and trying to make sense of it all.